Meeting of
the Faculty Alliance
Wednesday, November 15, 2006, 8:00am-9:30am
Draft Minutes
1. Call
to order and roll call
Shirish Patil, Chair of the
Chuck Craig, Chair, UAS Faculty Senate
Cathy Connor, Chair-elect, UAS Faculty Senate
Jon Genetti, President-Elect, UAF Faculty Senate
Tim Hinterberger, Representative, UAA Faculty Senate
Graduate Affairs Board
Bogdan Hoanca, 1st Vice President, UAA Faculty
Senate
Paul Layer, Past President, UAF Faculty Senate
Kerri Morris, President, UAA Faculty Senate
Lynn Shepherd, Past Chair of the
Pat Ivey, Executive Officer
Others:
Nate
Raymond Sun Star
Kortnie Westfall, Sun Star
Gwen White, Director, SW Institutional Research
Debra Carter, SW Employee Communications Specialist
2. Adopt agenda
“The Faculty Alliance moves to adopt the agenda for the November 15, 2006 meeting. This action is effective November 15, 2006.”
3. Approve minutes
“The Faculty Alliance moves to approve the minutes of the September 20, 2006 meeting as amended. This action is effective November 15, 2006.”
4. Report from the Chair
Shirish Patil reported that he worked
with Dave Veazey on student success and attended two meetings of the Systemwide
Academic Council. He is charged to work
with Dave Veazey to develop a comprehensive student success plan. The major part still to be resolved is where
the funding goes. Patil would
like to see the majority of the funding go to the MAUs for student success
rather than using an RFP process.
Faculty
5. New Business
5.1. Student
Success
5.1.1. Summary of Discussions on October 18
Members agreed that it was very helpful for each of the universities to talk about their institutions in context and realize that their needs are different; then to hear from President Hamilton that the student success initiatives have been going on for a long time. It is more useful to look at our own best practices within the university across the MAUs than to look at national models
Patil said he reported on the
retreat to the Board of Regents. Regents appreciated the
5.1.2 Draft
Plan of Action
See item 4 above.
5.1.3 Motion
in Support of Additional State-Funded Needs Based Financial Aid
President Hamilton thanked the Faculty Alliance at the System Governance Council meeting, saying he was pleased that staff are working with faculty on student success (by inviting Jeff Stepp). Kerri Morris said that being aware of what both sides are doing was very beneficial and that crucial aspects of the student success picture lay within the Student Services Council. Patil will also be working very closely with Sven Gilkey, ASUAF president and chair of the System Governance Council on this issue.
Sven Gilkey also addressed the
Board of Regents on November 1 about the need for more needs based financial
aide and that the Coalition of Student Leaders had taken this up as its top
priority for the 2007 legislative session. The
MOTION- passed unanimously
“The Faculty Alliance supports the Coalition of Student Leaders and the UA Board of Regents in their efforts to secure additional state-funded needs-based financial aid in partial fulfillment of Goal 1 of the UA Strategic Plan 2009 in order to enhance efforts in student recruitment and retention. This action is effective November 15, 2006.”
The question of locking in tuition
as an entering freshman is still under discussion within Saichi Oba’s task
force. Steve Hamilton is on that task
force for the
5.1.4 Activate
Banner Placement Module-Good Idea or Not?
Pete Pinney forwarded additional information after the retreat. UAS discussed this, and will be ready to make a decision on December 1. Kerry will forward it to the UAB but is pessimistic about its success. UAF trying to get Steve Smith to come to next faculty senate meeting and discuss this Rory O’Neill from OIT said the decision t activate the Banner placement module should rest in Admissions or at least at the MAUs and then IT will come in to program it. The earliest it could happen is end of this academic year or next fall.
5.1.5 Integrated
Funding Plan for Student Success
Shirish Patil has a draft and as
soon as he has it complete, will forward it to
5.1.7 Next Student Success Retreat – January, 2007;
-
Date, Location, Participants, Funding, Coordination
Dave Veazey is working on obtaining
a Student Success expert for a retreat with the
Kerry Morris said that the Student Services Council should be invited because they have helpful insights.
Cathy Connor said integrating
advising into faculty workloads is very important. If they are going to be serious about student
success, that has to be included in workload and is a signal that student
success is important. Workload agreements dictate 40 hours per week but
something as central to the university as advising must be included in the
workload and accounted for in the core time.
It needs to be included as a unit in the workload. A grievance has been
filed in
5.1.8 Other
Student Success Topics
There were no other student success topics.
5.2 Other
New Business
There was no other new business.
6. Old Business
6.1 VPAA
Search
Betty Hasler met with VPAA search committee. Sixty candidates were initially contacted with only two positive responses. Since the task force last met, Hasler has received 5-7 more positive responses. Next meeting is December 11 or 12. The ad for the position was in the Chronicle. It is not know how many responses were received from the ad. Hasler has encouraged the UA faculty to submit nominations if they know of any potential strong candidates. Any candidates should have a strong classroom experience. The intent is to fill position by end of academic year, provided a suitable candidate is found.
6.2 Performance
Measures
Gwen White did a system analysis which is currently under review by provosts, chancellors and the president. There is a preliminary system analysis on the web but know that some of the data will change. White hopes to have the final approved document within two-three weeks. Under review along with this are the president’s proposed assessment of 04-06 performance and future performance measures. White will send missions and measures link with all three MAUs rolled together. Pat Pitney is working with Senator Dyson’s office on performance measures and how to make the process less painful within the MAUs. Institutional Research and Budget staff are meeting with MAU counterparts on how we can streamline the reporting process. She said that performance based budgeting as we know it will be more codified. She hopes to cut out the pieces the university is no longer required to provide that may not be valuable externally. It is expected that Senator Dyson will say keep the same five performance measures plus add graduation rates. Institutional research and budget will keep on working on outreach activities measures but that will not be legislatively mandated.
On the same note, Secretary Spelling
wants to hold a yardstick to colleges, and create a central database. There is
an official federally defined way to measure retention but that probably does
not exactly work for us. UA wants to add
it as a measure and add federal definition but the federal definition only
covers 15 percent of the UA students. No
one has a really good way to track transfer students because of FERPA but we do
our best to approximate. The university
will develop its own criteria for success for
Regarding working with Senator Dyson’s
staff on measures we can live with, things look very positive. Ideally, we will clean up processes and make
everyone’s life easier. Dyson introduced legislation last year that
not successful and will reintroduce modified legislation this next session. The
6.3 Performance
Measures – Outreach Activities
6.4 Other
Old Business
There was no other old business.
7. Reports
7.1 Systemwide
Academic Council
SAC Reports from Patil went out to
MyUA went live last week. Program approvals in emergency management will be going to regents. The guaranteed tuition task force is in place and looking forward to task force recommendations. E-Live went very well. Richard Shointuch made a good presentation.
Regarding the SAC/RAC meeting, the consensus was that academic planning should drive the building process. Ordinarily, capital projects go straight to the Business Council and then to facilities committee who make decisions on what’s good for students without SAC being involved. Having people who will use the space involved in planning is a big thing. From a systemwide perspective, SAC needs to be involved for all facilities and RAC for research facilities.
7.2 Business
Council
There have been two business
council meetings since the last
7.3 Human
Resources Council
The Human Resources Council met in
7.4 Retirement
Committee
Statewide prefers for the state to put the money directly into PERS and TRS instead of sending it to the university. If it comes through the UA budget, the budget looks inflated, the TRS rates won’t go up and this affects the ORP rates, and would affect research grant rates. Roughly half the faculty are on ORP1.
7.5 Student
Services Council
Kerri will send Pat the notes from the meeting. SSC talked about the tuition task force in detail. There was also a lot of discussion about FERPA. The university might want to have some online training for FERPA especially for faculty and advisors about what information can be given out on the phone. SSC discussed drops for non-payment.
7.6 IT
Council
Curt Madison has been putting together a starter manual for students taking distance education courses for setting up accounts, getting into Blackboard etc. The draft should be on the DESB web page. He is also putting out an RFP for security review, also looking at business practices.
7.7 Research
Advisory Council
The Research Advisory Council last met on its own in October.
8. Senate Reports
The UAA Faculty Senate passed a motion to allow honors to be figured differently for purposes of publication. Right now, 60 percent of honors students aren’t honored at graduation.
UAF Faculty Senate spent
substantial time on plus-minus grades. There are still some issues that need to
be addressed. The Senate is also looking at how to view collegiate learning
assessment. Curt Madison talked about
the transparency in distance education and gave an update on DESB. How can we get input from faculty serving on
DESB. One way might be when chancellor
appoints DESB members, the chancellor appoints in consultation with the
senates. Otherwise, the senates and the
UAS Faculty Senate talked about
Banner and placement issues, making sure committees are working; recapped
9. Agenda items for December 13, 2006
meeting
Agenda items should be sent to Pat Ivey ten days in advance of the meeting.
10. Comments
There were no additional comments.
11. Adjourn
The meeting was adjourned at 9:37am.